At the 2026 World Defence Show (WDS 2026) in Riyadh, Pakistan’s defence industry openly began delivering the right message about its capabilities and what it truly has to offer the wider world – i.e., design and integration, not turnkey manufacturing.
Global Industrial and Defence Solutions (GIDS) displayed its wide range of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) – from the Shahpar II and Shahpar-III drones to the Yalghar- and Blaze-series of loitering munitions – and stand-off range weapons (SOW), be it stealthy air-launched cruise missiles (ALCM) like the Taimur and AZB-81LR, land-launched Fatah and shipborne SMASH, and AZB-series range-extension kits, among others.
Separately, Heavy Industries Taxila (HIT) began overtly marketing the fact that it fully designed, developed, and tested an original 155 mm/52-calibre wheeled self-propelled howitzer (SPH) for Saudi Arabian Military Industries (SAMI), and that the core design is now available for sale to the Pakistan Army and to third parties.
Finally, Karachi Shipyard & Engineering Works (KSEW) received the contract to build the first Jinnah-class frigate, an original naval warship designed in collaboration with Türkiye’s Askeri Fabrika ve Tersane İşletme AŞ (ASFAT).
The common thread across all of these solutions is that Pakistan has designed (or, with partners like Türkiye and China, co-designed) products for which it owns the intellectual property (IP) and understands how to leverage that IP to make decisions on the inputs – such as alloys, subsystems, and propulsion – as a way to control costs, avoid sanctions, and adapt to potential end-user/customer requirements.
This is a break from the previous era of Pakistan’s defence industry, where key vendors such as Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC), KSEW, and HIT were answerable to and reliant on foreign original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).
Thus, if the OEMs (or their governments) were not supportive of their Pakistani partners, then products such as the JF-17 fighter, Agosta 90B submarine, or al-Khalid tank would not develop or matter past the limits set by the OEMs.
Basically, one issue with the previous defence industry model was that the main OEM controlled the lion’s share of the weapon system’s development, customization, and its availability to other markets. If that one OEM did not align with Pakistan on an issue, the entire project could be at risk of premature termination.
For example, the chill in French-Pakistani defence ties likely contributed to an earlier end to the Pakistan Navy (PN) Agosta 90B program than originally planned (i.e., no follow-on orders from the PN and third-party export sales). Likewise, PAC cannot market the JF-17 to other countries without the Aviation Industry Corporation of China’s (AVIC) support, as AVIC’s subsidiaries supply key inputs and have led the JF-17’s development.
In contrast, the next generation of Pakistani defence solutions – e.g., the P251 wheeled SPH, Jinnah-class frigate, the Ribbat electronic support measures (ESM) system, GIDS’ munitions and drones, and so on – are not dependent on a single foreign OEM to direct or manage the designs. That work is done by Pakistan’s SOEs and, in turn, those SOEs will command the largest proportion (i.e., lion’s share) of the product; however, this must not be conflated with managing the majority.
Don't Stop Here. Unlock the Rest of this Analysis Immediately
To read the rest of this deep dive -- including the honest assessments and comparative analyses that Quwa Plus members rely on -- you need access.
