Between 2016 and 2026, the Pakistan Army (PA) has built a sizable capacity for precision firing across its armour and artillery, and, more recently, its aviation arm. In tandem, the PA has also initiated a series of domestic programs to source precision-fire-capable platforms (e.g., the AIMS automated mortar system and P251 wheeled howitzer) and precision-guided munitions (PGMs), ranging from dedicated shells and missiles to retrofit kits for existing legacy stocks. Recently, the PA also formed a dedicated arm – i.e., the Army Rocket Force Command (ARFC) – to manage its burgeoning stand-off range strike capacity via the Fatah-series of ballistic and cruise missiles.
Similar to the Pakistan Air Force’s (PAF) growing capacity for airborne precision strikes, the PA’s current trajectory is building technology and capability depth at two links in the broader precision-firing chain: the firing solutions (e.g., howitzers, munitions, etc.) and the intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance (ISTAR) infrastructure. In fact, the latter has seen significant growth in the previous year through the launch of the Space and Upper Atmosphere Commission’s (SUPARCO) HS-1 hyperspectral imaging satellite, the PRSC-EO2 electro-optical satellite, and possibly the PRSC-S1, a synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite. A deal was also signed last year for an interferometric SAR (InSAR) constellation.
If satellites are added to the PA’s ongoing investment in electronic support measures (ESM) and electronic warfare (EW), radars (via air defence programs), and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), the ISTAR part of the firing chain/kill chain will likely become among the region’s most robust setups by 2030. However, like the PAF, the PA will now need to focus on the middle-layer links between ISTAR and precision-strike so as to drive the full wartime benefits of these investments, such as eliminating stale/out-of-date targeting data, rapid retargeting in fast-changing battlefields, and preserving high-cost munitions stocks by ensuring that the strikes succeed at relatively high rates thanks to better and more timely targeting.
The middle-layer links comprise many existing, in-development, and future systems – but the common underlying issue they are all working to solve is minimizing information-flow latency. In other words, the goal is to compress the time from when the ISTAR stack (e.g., sensors) “sees the target” to when a firing platform launches a munition at the target.
Last Mile Systems in the Platforms
It is worth noting that the PA’s new platforms have largely solved the latency challenge at the launch step – i.e., the last link in the kill chain. This is because these systems are all integrated with a new digital fire control system (DFCS) that can directly draw on an external ISTAR source, notably GNSS/GPS. Thus, a measure of automated targeting-to-firing element is already present.
SH-15 Automatic Fire Control System (AFCS) and C4ISR Integration
The SH-15’s onboard systems reduce latency at two levels: the fire-control computation itself and the platform’s integration into the broader network.
At the fire control level, the SH-15 features onboard data computation with automatic and semi-automatic laying modes.1
The AFCS accepts azimuth data from the operator, computes the trajectory autonomously using the vehicle-mounted computer, and automatically lays the gun, thus eliminating the manual steps of map plotting, manual trajectory calculation, and voice-relayed fire commands of legacy gun-laying.
A semi-automatic loader further reduces the crew’s manual workload between rounds. NORINCO states that the SH-15’s rise-and-fall suspension mechanism improves the firing accuracy of unguided projectiles by 50 percent, which it describes as providing “para-precision strike capability.” So, even unguided rounds benefit from tighter dispersion, thus reducing the number of rounds needed per target or, at least, allowing the PA to conserve costlier guided shells.2
At the navigation and targeting level, the PA’s own specifications confirm that the SH-15 has onboard navigation and target acquisition through three independent GNSS constellations – i.e., GPS, GLONASS, and BeiDou – as well as INS.3
The triple-constellation GNSS is a latency enabler because it offers resilience to single-constellation denial: if GPS is jammed, the AFCS can switch to another constellation without the crew needing to manually reconfigure the system or fall back to map-based orientation.
The INS backup enables continued operation, albeit at reduced accuracy, in a fully GNSS/GPS-denied environment, without the manual surveying steps that legacy systems require.
At the network level, NORINCO states that the SH-15 is “equipped with C4ISR equipment for networked or autonomous operation” and a “modular information management system” that “realizes information sharing among the whole crew.”4
This dual-mode architecture is significant for latency: in networked mode, the SH-15 can receive fire missions digitally from PAKFIRE or another C2 node, compressing the fire command chain to a digital transaction. In autonomous mode (i.e., if the network is disrupted by EW or the gun is operating beyond communications range), the crew can compute and fire independently using onboard sensors and the triple-GNSS/INS navigation system.
Quwa Pro
See Where Pakistan's Defence Market is Moving
Get Pakistani-led market intelligence that helps you track emerging requirements, vendor positioning, and procurement signals. Move ahead of your competitors before the picture becomes widely visible.
Use Pro Today Already a subscriber?Sign in
