The Army Rocket Force Command (ARFC) gives Rawalpindi an organizational structure for conventional deep fires. Its credibility will depend on the depth of its magazines, the tempo of production, and the targeting architecture that connects ISR to strikes.
At the same time, the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) already operates a scalable strike option through the JF-17 paired with range-extension kits (REKs). These glide-bomb kits (also designated as the AZB) convert Mk-80-series bombs into precision, stand-off munitions at a cost Pakistan can sustain.
This analysis explains “Boots Theory,” assesses ARFC’s role and limitations, evaluates the JF-17’s affordability compared to Western fighters, and examines REK’s capability and cost. It also draws on Ukraine’s use of glide kits for context, explores doctrinal integration between ARFC and JF-17/REK, and outlines Pakistan’s industrial pathway to stockpiling kits at scale.
Get access to this article and all other Quwa content today.
Click Here
Related Reads
- Report: Industrial Reality Will Dictate Pakistan’s Conventional Deterrence Credibility
- How the Z-10ME Redefines the Role of Pakistan’s Army Aviation Corps
- Analysis: Pakistan’s Underrated Maritime Air Presence – and its Future Challenges
That said, two uncertainties limit what any rocket force can guarantee on night one: interception and accuracy. Ukraine’s experience shows that capable, well-served air defences can stop large volumes of cruise missiles – with measured intercept rates frequently reported in the ~70–80% bracket at their peak, though varying over time with inventory and tactics – while ballistic missiles complicate interception but still face attrition and decoys/pen-aids dynamics.
Circular error probable (CEP) performance also matters. Single-digit-metre CEPs are often claimed for some modern SSMs, but open sources document mixed results in the field, especially under jamming and when defenders adapt routes and timing. In Pakistan’s case, the Fatah-1 and Fatah-2 offer CEPs of under 15 m and 50 m, respectively; thus, their efficacy at scale could be questioned if used against smaller targets. The net point for planners is simple: some percentage will leak, some will miss, and the defender will adapt, so the magazine must be deep.
Value of JF-17 and AZB/REK
Even if ARFC lands its first punches, those effects decay unless Pakistan can sustain precision strikes day after day. That is where JF-17 + REK/AZB comes in: to convert opening-salvo gains into durable, rolling pressure at lower cost per effect. The PAF should have fewer bottlenecks here: the Thunder fleet is large, the platform is already deeply integrated into PAF doctrine, and the Range-Extension Kit (REK) / AZB family (essentially Pakistan’s analogous solution to the JDAM) can be produced and replenished locally from National Engineering and Scientific Commission’s (NESCOM) facilities. With more J-10CEs pulled toward air-superiority tasks, more JF-17s can shift to the strike lane and push two to four REKs per sortie from outside high-threat SAM envelopes.
ARFC’s salvos can preserve PAF mass by degrading BrahMos TELs, key IADS nodes, and runway generation, reducing the density and reach of Indian fires that threaten airbases and strike packages. In turn, once the most dangerous belts are thinned, JF-17/REK can scale out, with dozens of daily standoff releases against depots, repair hubs, and fixed infrastructure. The two arms are ought to be organized together: ARFC opens the window; JF-17/REK keeps it open and widens it.
Pakistan’s strike doctrine needs a simple yardstick for choices between SSM and fighter-delivered PGBs. A practical way to compare options is Cost of Attack (CoA): the all-in rupee or dollar cost required to deliver one effective strike on a target. CoA forces planners to count not only the sticker price of a missile or kit, but also platform costs per attack, sortie productivity (multiple weapons per pass), and probability of success once interception, jamming, and CEP are considered.
Quwa Plus
Finish the Story. Get the Full Picture.
Unlock independent journalism and deeper analysis that help you make sense of Pakistan’s key defence and policy developments without relying on shallow or foreign-framed coverage.
Join ($29.99/Year) Already a subscriber?Sign in
