Skip to content Skip to footer

Turkey Makes Statement in Aerospace & Aims to Soar in 2023

Turkey wants to make a statement in the aerospace world, especially in 2023, i.e., in time of the country’s centennial or 100th anniversary since its formation.

This statement will be a three-pronged display starting with the maiden flights of the Hürjet trainer and T929 ATAK-2 attack helicopter, and the rolling out of the first Milli Muharip Uçak (MMU) next-generation fighter aircraft (NGFA). These three aircraft are Turkish Aerospace Industries’ (TUSAŞ) flagship programs.

During TEKNOFEST 2022 (Teknofest Aerospace and Technology Festival), TUSAŞ’ general manager, Temel Kotil, reflected on the growth of Turkey’s defence industry. Kotil said that one of the aims of TEKNOFEST, which is Turkey’s largest aerospace exhibition, is to “tell children and young people that it is not difficult to make an airplane.” The goal, evidently, is to rally public excitement for Turkey’s aerospace projects.

The first of these new marquee programs is the TUSAŞ Hürjet, a lead-in-fighter-trainer (LIFT) and, through a later variant, lightweight multirole combat aircraft.

According to Kotil, TUSAŞ is carrying out the final assembly work of the first prototype of the Hürjet. Kotil said that TUSAŞ is aiming to test fly the Hürjet by 18 March 2023, i.e., Turkey’s 100th anniversary. The date is significant and, in Turkey’s view, fitting to showcase Turkey’s first homegrown jet fighter.

The Hürjet is a significant program for several reasons.

First, it is Turkey’s first foray into designing critical technology inputs for a modern fighter aircraft, such as the flight control system (FCS), avionics suite, aerostructures, and so on.

Before embarking on the Hürjet, Turkey built decades of experience manufacturing inputs under license and as a supply chain producer in a consortium (e.g., the Lockheed Martin F-16, Airbus A400M, and the Lockheed Martin F-35). So, it has a measure of aerospace experience, but it now wants to evolve towards a point where it can produce original solutions of its own.

Second, while the Hürjet is more modest in scope compared to the MMU NGFA, it is still a significant step in its own right. The Hürjet will start as a LIFT, but TUSAŞ will develop a follow-up variant that will operate as a lightweight multirole combat aircraft. In fact, TUSAŞ proposed Hürjet to Malaysia for the latter’s new lightweight combat aircraft requirement. Basically, Turkey will produce its own modern fighter very soon.

Third, the Hürjet was a necessary intermediary step towards the more complex MMU. It is likely that the Turks used what they had learned in developing the Hürjet’s inputs towards the MMU. Moreover, while Turkey has set ambitious timelines for the MMU, it is unclear if that program will achieve those deadlines as it is much more complex and expansive than, for example, the Hürjet.

Overall, it would not be surprising if the Hürjet defines the growth of Turkey’s aerospace industry through the rest of the 2020s. In itself, successfully developing and launching the Hürjet into production would be a significant achievement for Turkey. This is not simply a lightweight fighter, but a homegrown design that uses domestically designed critical inputs. Considering how much difficulty India had with trying to achieve the same with its Tejas, seeing Turkey potentially achieve the same within 10-12 years is to be applauded.

In fact, it is the more ‘modest’ of Turkey’s programs that will likely define its aerospace industry. Being a nationally-owned entity, TUSAŞ only represents one side of the Turkish aerospace industry. There is also a whole other world built around Turkey’s emerging private sector as well.

Interestingly, one of the private sector’s flagship projects was sitting beside the Hürjet at TEKNOFEST, i.e., the first live prototype of the Baykar Bayraktar Kızılelma.

The Bayraktar Kızılelma is Turkey’s main effort to develop its an unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) for a variety of applications, including carrier operations and loyal wingman operations. Interestingly, like TUSAŞ’ flagship programs, Baykar is aiming to fly the Kızılelma in 2023.

However, the current war between Ukraine and Russia could impact the Kızılelma. Baykar is relying on the Ukrainians to supply the engines for the Kızılelma. It will be interesting to see if Turkey is building backup options should the AI-25TL and AI-322F turbofan deals fall through.

In fact, TUSAŞ Engine Industries (TEI) is developing the TF-6000 turbofan engine. With a dry thrust of 6,000 lbf (i.e., 26.7 kN), the TF-6000 offers more thrust than the AI-25TL.

This engine could support the Kızılelma and, potentially, offer Turkey a locally-sourced powerplant for its UCAV. If the situation in Ukraine fails to improve, one could plausibly see Turkey expand this turbofan line into larger and more powerful engine designs.

Baykar is looking to use the AI-322F, an afterburning engine that can reach a thrust of 41 kN. Likewise, the Hürjet relies on the GE F404, an afterburning engine with a maximum thrust of 78.7 kN. So, with instability and regulatory uncertainty clouding the Ukrainian and American engines, respectively, it would behoove Turkey to consider developing similar powerplants. Otherwise, the Hürjet and Kızılelma programs can stall or – and this is great importance for Ankara – hamper the country’s export efforts.

In fact, the board chairman and general manager of Baykar, Haluk Bayraktar, said that Turkey is aiming to spread TEKNOFEST to other countries, notably Pakistan, Indonesia, and Azerbaijan. Though the statement was about setting up aerospace festivals, Bayraktar called out Turkey’s key target markets.

Thus, Turkey will likely intensify its efforts to secure markets for its flagship products, be it the Hürjet, T-929, Kızılelma, and others. However, Ankara knows from experience that relying on third-party suppliers for key inputs, especially engines, can easily jeopardize a high-profile sale.

Basically, the rest of the 2020s will likely see Turkey both complete the Hürjet and Kızılelma projects and, potentially, develop engines comparable to the AI-322F and GE F404. However, because these are high-cost, high-complexity endeavours, Turkey would need to expand its funding sources and drive more scale.

While circular – i.e., to secure export markets it needs those same export markets – it seems that Ankara is actively thinking along those lines. It wants to nurture several big markets to complement the domestic userbase (especially Pakistan and Indonesia). To earn the confidence of those markets, Turkey would need to show that it is serious about developing every critical input.

One thing Turkey can offer those markets (and seems to be open to doing so) is access to the technology and industrial participation benefits. Promoting TEKNOFEST in those countries could be a way to generate interest among government officials and private sector actors in those countries towards these promises.

Overall, Turkey’s aerospace industry vision and ambition are both growing, and they could envelop several big countries along the way. If successful, Turkey will certainly make a statement in the aerospace world.